The Commonwealth Fund released a scorecard on women’s health and reproductive care. Many in the media pointed out that states in the Northeast where permissive abortion laws exist did better than the Southeast where pro-life states are. But the comparison was made on twenty-twenty-two data. The Dobbs decision wasn’t until June and many states didn’t pass pro-life legislation until later in the year. The scorecard didn’t compare between pre and post Dobbs data and shared no evidence pro-life laws negatively impacted public-health outcomes. It also didn’t consider the South is home to more poverty, thus more negative health outcomes. But a growing body of data shows pro-life laws are followed by positive public-health outcomes. Why is it the media doesn’t tell you that? I think I know.
Back

Scorecard Gets it Wrong
Bradley Mattes | August 19, 2024
00:00
00:00
April 17, 2025
Sunday’s Coming!
As we enter into what are considered the most solemn days of the calendar, let’s pause from our busy lives...
Read MoreApril 10, 2025
Exposing FIGO’s Abortion Agenda
Extreme pro-abortion organizations are known to hide behind a façade of legitimate medicine and science. The Population Research Institute has...
Read MoreApril 03, 2025
Standing for Life in Brazil
In my volunteer role as president of the International Right to Life Federation I have the distinct honor of representing...
Read More
Leave a Reply