The Commonwealth Fund released a scorecard on women’s health and reproductive care. Many in the media pointed out that states in the Northeast where permissive abortion laws exist did better than the Southeast where pro-life states are. But the comparison was made on twenty-twenty-two data. The Dobbs decision wasn’t until June and many states didn’t pass pro-life legislation until later in the year. The scorecard didn’t compare between pre and post Dobbs data and shared no evidence pro-life laws negatively impacted public-health outcomes. It also didn’t consider the South is home to more poverty, thus more negative health outcomes. But a growing body of data shows pro-life laws are followed by positive public-health outcomes. Why is it the media doesn’t tell you that? I think I know.
Back
Scorecard Gets it Wrong
Bradley Mattes | August 19, 2024
00:00
00:00
April 30, 2026
A Generation Ready for Battle
Ronald Reagan famously said, “freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction..” While Reagan was absolutely correct, I...
Read MoreApril 23, 2026
Pro-Life Spider Man Sent to Jail
Maison DesChamps, an outspoken pro-life advocate and friend of mine, has been sentenced to 45 days in jail and fined $75,000 for climbing...
Read MoreApril 16, 2026
Refuting Claims that the Bible Defends Abortion
“The Bible never mentions abortion, the Bible says life begins at first breath, the Bible says…” Many pro-life Christians have...
Read More
Leave a Reply