The Commonwealth Fund released a scorecard on women’s health and reproductive care. Many in the media pointed out that states in the Northeast where permissive abortion laws exist did better than the Southeast where pro-life states are. But the comparison was made on twenty-twenty-two data. The Dobbs decision wasn’t until June and many states didn’t pass pro-life legislation until later in the year. The scorecard didn’t compare between pre and post Dobbs data and shared no evidence pro-life laws negatively impacted public-health outcomes. It also didn’t consider the South is home to more poverty, thus more negative health outcomes. But a growing body of data shows pro-life laws are followed by positive public-health outcomes. Why is it the media doesn’t tell you that? I think I know.
Back
Scorecard Gets it Wrong
Bradley Mattes | August 19, 2024
00:00
00:00
September 26, 2024
What Creating a Pro-Life Culture Looks Like
Creating a culture of life looks like defending the unborn and continuing to support them after they are born. The...
Read MoreSeptember 19, 2024
Chemical Abortion Pills Kill Mother and Twins
It is no surprise that pro-abortion activists are willing to lie; it is the backbone of the entire industry. However,...
Read MoreSeptember 12, 2024
Correcting the Lies Told at the Debate
As the Presidential election draws near, it is crucial that the American people receive accurate information about abortion. Lives are...
Read More
Leave a Reply