A presidential candidate – I won’t share his party or name. What’s important is understanding he’s wrong. While describing himself as “unapologetically pro-life,” he said, “I would not support a federal abortion ban of any kind.” The candidate claims the constitution says abortion’s only a state’s rights issue. It’s true the Supreme Court reversed Roe and returned abortion to the states. But the Court did not say the constitution forbids congress from enacting legislation protecting the unborn. If we are to protect the babies in blue states like California, Illinois, and Maryland, we need federal legislation that’ll protect all American citizens, born or unborn. Always be discerning when candidates talk about abortion. The babies deserve better than those who compromise our efforts.
Back

Federal Pro-Life Legislation
Bradley Mattes | August 17, 2023
February 20, 2025
Planned Parenthood’s Dirty Secrets Exposed
I was pleasantly shocked to read an in-depth article from the New York Times critical of Planned Parenthood titled Botched...
Read MoreFebruary 18, 2025
February 2025 The Shield
Inside this edition of The Shield Click on picture to download a printable file of the newsletter.
Read MoreFebruary 18, 2025
Personnel is Policy
Millions of pro-life Americans were shocked and dis-appointed during the campaign last year when the most pro-life president in our...
Read More
Leave a Reply