Federal Pro-Life Legislation

Back

Federal Pro-Life Legislation

Bradley Mattes   |   August 17, 2023

A presidential candidate – I won’t share his party or name.  What’s important is understanding he’s wrong.  While describing himself as “unapologetically pro-life,” he said, “I would not support a federal abortion ban of any kind.”  The candidate claims the constitution says abortion’s only a state’s rights issue.  It’s true the Supreme Court reversed Roe and returned abortion to the states.  But the Court did not say the constitution forbids congress from enacting legislation protecting the unborn.  If we are to protect the babies in blue states like California, Illinois, and Maryland, we need federal legislation that’ll protect all American citizens, born or unborn.  Always be discerning when candidates talk about abortion.  The babies deserve better than those who compromise our efforts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Latest News

From our articles & videos

View all

November 06, 2025

The Election of Pro-Abortion Radicals

This week’s election results are an alarming reminder of how much work is still to be done.  Radical pro-abortion candidates...

Read More

October 30, 2025

The Foundation of the Pro-Life Position  

“It is immoral to unjustly take the life of a human”   Recently on our social media a user asked us,...

Read More

October 23, 2025

Refuting the Claim that Personhood Begins at Sentience  

“The fetus isn’t really a person until they have sentience.”   As we continue in our series of pro-life apologetics, let’s...

Read More