A presidential candidate – I won’t share his party or name. What’s important is understanding he’s wrong. While describing himself as “unapologetically pro-life,” he said, “I would not support a federal abortion ban of any kind.” The candidate claims the constitution says abortion’s only a state’s rights issue. It’s true the Supreme Court reversed Roe and returned abortion to the states. But the Court did not say the constitution forbids congress from enacting legislation protecting the unborn. If we are to protect the babies in blue states like California, Illinois, and Maryland, we need federal legislation that’ll protect all American citizens, born or unborn. Always be discerning when candidates talk about abortion. The babies deserve better than those who compromise our efforts.
Back

Federal Pro-Life Legislation
Bradley Mattes | August 17, 2023
November 30, 2023
Pro-Abortion Amendments Face Legal Challenges
The passing of radical pro-abortion ballot initiatives has had a demoralizing effect on both the pro-life movement and those who...
Read MoreNovember 23, 2023
Abortion Trafficking, A New Threat to Life
Idaho Governor Brad Little signed legislation meant to keep vulnerable minors and those who protect them one step ahead of...
Read MoreNovember 16, 2023
Embryonic Stem Cell Controversy, 25 Years Later
Those of us who lived through the great embryonic stem cell controversy are enjoying the sweet aroma of vindication. There’s...
Read More