Back

A Burning Issue

ve8QAd   |   October 28, 2020

This morning Townhall published my op ed on why expansion of the US Supreme Court is a supremely bad idea for protecting America’s unborn babies and their moms. It’s really important that we make our case to as many of our fellow citizens as possible, so please share it. The timing is urgent.

For LIFE,
Brad Mattes

Opinion

A Burning Issue

Bradley Mattes

Posted: Oct 28, 2020 12:01 AM

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.


Source: AP Photo/Steve Helber

One of the burning policy issues raised for public discussion this year is the idea of expanding the U.S. Supreme Court. And with the nation’s highest court so close to impacting Roe v Wade, pro-life Americans have a lot of skin in the game.

Our founding fathers demonstrated a brilliant understanding of government and the people it was designed to serve. They devised three independent but co-equal branches of government to function as a system of checks and balances. The legislative branch makes laws, and the executive branch implements the laws. Finally, when called upon, the federal courts (the judicial branch) weigh in on their constitutionality. The U.S. Supreme Court, should it decide to take a case, has the final authority.

With Justice Amy Barrett’s confirmation comes a renewed threat by pro-abortion activists to expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court, and to fill these additional seats with abortion advocates.

If those who support Court expansion get their way, it would politicize and undermine the independence of the judiciary branch and make it a political arm of the legislative branch.

Instead of checks and balances, the Supreme Court would churn out partisan results ad nauseum. The Constitution would be reduced to a “living document” that caters to the whim of prevailing social and political opinion.

We would no longer have three co-equal branches of government to protect the constitutional rights of American citizens, we would be faced with two legislative bodies and one executive branch. The devastating legal fallout would be inflicted on the lives of every living American.

Speaking of living Americans, the decades-long effort of turning back the bloody tide of abortion by eroding or outright reversing Roe v. Wade would be a mere pipe dream for the foreseeable future—just when we’re enticingly close to making a dramatic impact on abortion law which currently accommodates abortion on demand throughout pregnancy.

A court expansion would cost the lives of millions of more babies, while enslaving their mothers by the emotional devastation that often follows abortion.

Life Issues Institute produced video and radio specials featuring the critical importance of the US Supreme Court to ending legal abortion in America. Days after ending production, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died.

Since then, they have been at the epicenter of educating our nation’s citizens to the urgent reality that they play a central role in who ultimately sits on the Supreme Court.

Expanding the Court would impose radical repercussions on our Constitution, the balance of powers, the rule of law, and on every American, particularly our unborn citizens.

Brad Mattes is President of Life Issues Institute

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Latest News

From our articles & videos

View all

February 15, 2024

Lies Coercion Silencing and Hiding

These are ways the abortion industry and its supporters strive to impose abortion until birth on America. Lies, coercion, silencing,...

Read More

February 09, 2024

Debunking the Myth of Overpopulation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 9, 2024| Link Contact: Victor Nieves, vnieves@lifeissues.org 513-719-5813 Debunking the Myth of Overpopulation It has been...

Read More

February 08, 2024

The Myth of Overpopulation Debunked

Elon Musk is one of the few who have gotten it right. Contrary to what you’re hearing, the world does...

Read More