Rights for Rivers but Not Babies

Back
Placeholder Image

Rights for Rivers but Not Babies

Bradley Mattes   |   March 29, 2017

More and more environmental organizations are voicing support for abortion as a way to protect the environment.  Now we’re seeing laws bestowing rights to nature, such as rivers in New Zealand and the United Kingdom.  As a result, anyone can sue in a court of law in the name of defending nature.  So rivers, plants and animals would have the same rights as human beings.  It’s no leap in logic to impose abortion on demand throughout pregnancy because human beings are considered a blight on nature.  Even cities like Santa Monica, California, where there’s really no nature to protect, instituted a law recognizing the “rights of nature.”   Make no mistake, radical environmentalism has become a zealous religion that’s imposing its belief on society at the expense of innocent human life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Latest News

From our articles & videos

View all

September 26, 2024

What Creating a Pro-Life Culture Looks Like

Creating a culture of life looks like defending the unborn and continuing to support them after they are born. The...

Read More

September 19, 2024

Chemical Abortion Pills Kill Mother and Twins

It is no surprise that pro-abortion activists are willing to lie; it is the backbone of the entire industry. However,...

Read More

September 12, 2024

Correcting the Lies Told at the Debate

As the Presidential election draws near, it is crucial that the American people receive accurate information about abortion. Lives are...

Read More