Rights for Rivers but Not Babies

Placeholder Image

Rights for Rivers but Not Babies

Bradley Mattes   |   March 29, 2017

More and more environmental organizations are voicing support for abortion as a way to protect the environment.  Now we’re seeing laws bestowing rights to nature, such as rivers in New Zealand and the United Kingdom.  As a result, anyone can sue in a court of law in the name of defending nature.  So rivers, plants and animals would have the same rights as human beings.  It’s no leap in logic to impose abortion on demand throughout pregnancy because human beings are considered a blight on nature.  Even cities like Santa Monica, California, where there’s really no nature to protect, instituted a law recognizing the “rights of nature.”   Make no mistake, radical environmentalism has become a zealous religion that’s imposing its belief on society at the expense of innocent human life.

Latest News

From our articles & videos

View all

November 30, 2023

Pro-Abortion Amendments Face Legal Challenges

The passing of radical pro-abortion ballot initiatives has had a demoralizing effect on both the pro-life movement and those who...

Read More

November 23, 2023

Abortion Trafficking, A New Threat to Life

Idaho Governor Brad Little signed legislation meant to keep vulnerable minors and those who protect them one step ahead of...

Read More

November 16, 2023

Embryonic Stem Cell Controversy, 25 Years Later

Those of us who lived through the great embryonic stem cell controversy are enjoying the sweet aroma of vindication.   There’s...

Read More