More and more environmental organizations are voicing support for abortion as a way to protect the environment. Now we’re seeing laws bestowing rights to nature, such as rivers in New Zealand and the United Kingdom. As a result, anyone can sue in a court of law in the name of defending nature. So rivers, plants and animals would have the same rights as human beings. It’s no leap in logic to impose abortion on demand throughout pregnancy because human beings are considered a blight on nature. Even cities like Santa Monica, California, where there’s really no nature to protect, instituted a law recognizing the “rights of nature.” Make no mistake, radical environmentalism has become a zealous religion that’s imposing its belief on society at the expense of innocent human life.
Back

Rights for Rivers but Not Babies
Bradley Mattes | March 29, 2017
November 30, 2023
Pro-Abortion Amendments Face Legal Challenges
The passing of radical pro-abortion ballot initiatives has had a demoralizing effect on both the pro-life movement and those who...
Read MoreNovember 23, 2023
Abortion Trafficking, A New Threat to Life
Idaho Governor Brad Little signed legislation meant to keep vulnerable minors and those who protect them one step ahead of...
Read MoreNovember 16, 2023
Embryonic Stem Cell Controversy, 25 Years Later
Those of us who lived through the great embryonic stem cell controversy are enjoying the sweet aroma of vindication. There’s...
Read More