Lots of good came out of the presidential election. One was a majority of Americans now see the liberal, pro-abortion media for what it is. The worst of the lot is the New York Times, and they’ve admitted experiencing a major rebellion by their readers. The number of complaints they received regarding their biased coverage of the election was five times the normal. It’s the largest amount of feedback the paper has gotten since 9/11 — and they’re angry about the way the paper favored Hillary Clinton. Social media and the internet have changed the political landscape. Gone are the days when we only get the news from a select few sources with a political agenda. You can be part of the solution. Please share your pro-life beliefs through email and on social media sites.
Back

New York Times Takes It On the Chin
Bradley Mattes | November 29, 2016
December 07, 2023
Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers Face Mounting Attacks
Pro-life pregnancy centers are the tip of the spear in the fight for life, but now these centers face mounting...
Read MoreNovember 30, 2023
Pro-Abortion Amendments Face Legal Challenges
The passing of radical pro-abortion ballot initiatives has had a demoralizing effect on both the pro-life movement and those who...
Read MoreNovember 23, 2023
Abortion Trafficking, A New Threat to Life
Idaho Governor Brad Little signed legislation meant to keep vulnerable minors and those who protect them one step ahead of...
Read More