Placeholder Image

A Painful Reality

ve8QAd   |   April 16, 2010

Imagine holding the youngest surviving premature child, born at just 21 weeks. We wouldn’t dare jostle her too roughly, let alone abandon her to the harshest of procedures. But had she not been born yet, even that very week, pro-abortion activists would think little of subjecting her to an excruciatingly painful death.

The people of Nebraska are saying “no more.” This week, the state legislature enacted groundbreaking pro-life legislation. The Pain-Capable Child Protection Act is the first in the nation to ban abortions after 20 weeks gestation not because of infant viability, but because preborn babies at that age can feel pain.

It’s new thinking that could successfully challenge Roe v. Wade. The Supreme Court always considered the age of viability to be the earliest point states could ban abortion, but Nebraska suggests a new, more compelling standard. Since our highest court has never heard an argument based on scientific evidence about fetal pain, there is no precedent. This would be an original case, and one with potential for success.

The Court already opened the door in 2003 when they affirmed the right of states to ban certain procedures which “might cause the medical profession or society as a whole to become insensitive, even disdainful, to life, including life in the human fetus.” If that doesn’t fit the bill, I don’t know what does.

Of course pro-abortion activists are already trying to discredit the facts about fetal pain, pushing aside the research and testimony of a multitude of physicians. They played this same game years ago, when the cruelty of partial-birth abortion came to light. But thanks to technology, we know far more about preborn babies than before. (Even Roe v. Wade’s standard of infant viability has had to be adjusted over time. Years ago, it was 28 weeks. Now, medical advances make it possible at 22-24 weeks.)

We know more about the impact of abortion on women, too. Nebraska passed a companion bill, requiring physicians to screen patients for possible physical or mental risks prior to an abortion – much as they do for other procedures – in hopes of preventing widely-reported post-abortion depression, trauma and suicide. The radical Center for Reproductive Rights calls this an “extreme” measure that “harms” women. They’re actually opposing efforts to help women in pain. At least we know where their priorities lie.

But fighting truth and compassion is a losing battle. Little by little, so-called abortion rights are being whittled away by the technology that first made them possible. If Nebraska’s law stands, we’ll take another step in the right direction.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

From our articles & videos

View all

June 06, 2024

Pro-Life States Successfully Defend Life

Since the reversal of Roe v Wade, we’ve read disappointing reports that the number of abortions in America has actually...

Read More

May 30, 2024

Protecting Women from Coerced Abortion

Since the demise of Roe v Wade and subsequent passage of pro-life legislation in various states, legislators are now forced...

Read More

May 23, 2024

Supporting Life Before and After Birth

It’s a source of continued frustration for pro-lifers. The Left repeatedly disparages us for not caring about women. They claim...

Read More