Pure Evil in All Its Glory

Bradley Mattes   |   August 19, 2015

There are times when after the procedure is done that the heart is actually still beating [after extraction]. — Dr. Ben Van Handel, Executive Director Novogenix Laboratories

The latest video revealing the horrors of Planned Parenthood selling baby body parts pulled back the curtain on some of the most hideous examples of not only a lack of value for human life, but a passionate desire to squeeze every dollar they can from the dead baby’s body.

Holly O’Donnell’s firsthand account of what happened when she worked for procurement company StemExpress continues what I can only describe as pure evil.

Screen capture from web documentary video “Planned Parenthood’s Custom Abortions for Superior Product.”

The day finally came that Holly was dreading; the abortionist delivered a baby boy entirely intact. A technician called Holly over to her work area and said, “I want you to see something kinda’ cool.” Then Holly watched as she tapped the baby’s chest with an instrument and the heart began to beat.

The tech then said, “This is a really good fetus and it looks like we can procure a lot from it. We’re gonna’ procure brain,” which is a highly sought after commodity in the baby body trafficking industry. Holly’s heart sank because she knew this meant cutting the baby’s head open. As if to confirm her worst nightmare, the tech said, “You go through the face.”

Holly recalled the horrific ordeal. “She gave me the scissor and told me I had to cut down the middle of the face. I can’t even describe what that feels like.” After the gore of that “procedure,” Holly’s mind began to wander through the forest of “what ifs.” This could be a future president, she thought. Regret and grief overwhelmed her as the veil of lies was finally removed from her eyes. “That was the moment I knew I couldn’t work with the company anymore.”

[tweetthis]How much are we willing to sacrifice in the name of medical advances? Whose life is expendable?[/tweetthis]

How much are we willing to sacrifice in the name of medical advances? Whose life is expendable? Is it possible to do good by doing evil? Pure evil?

In 1974, Dr. Peter Adam and a team of researchers published a paper with the unwieldy title Oxidation of Glucose and D-B-OH-Butyrate by the Early Human Fetal Brain. The goal was to see if the unborn child could produce substitute chemicals, at least temporarily, after being separated from the mother.

Twelve perfectly developing babies were cut from their mothers’ bodies by hysterotomy (similar to a cesarean). They then hooked up catheters through the tiny carotid arteries or aorta and set up a system to maintain circulation. He and his team then cut off the heads of 12 babies and kept their brains alive during the experiment.

When challenged, Dr. Adam hit squarely at the heart of the question: “Once society’s declared the fetus dead, and abrogated its rights, I don’t see any ethical problem. . . . Whose rights are we going to protect once we’ve decided the fetus won’t live?”

The Planned Parenthood videos are forcing this exact question upon us. It lurks just behind the mask of “women’s health,” “reproductive justice” and “choice.” It’s right there demanding an answer behind abortion activists’ lofty talk of medical advances for diseases like Alzheimer’s.

Historians will someday record our reaction to this ghastly revelation of what’s happening behind closed doors of Planned Parenthood’s abortion mills. I don’t want there to be the slightest question of which side of history I stood on, and I’m certain you don’t either.

We’ve made it easy for you to respond to this pure evil. The videos and things you can do are in one easy-to-reach location. Share this link with everyone you know and urge them to get involved—really get involved by acting to help end the pure evil of Planned Parenthood.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

From our articles & videos

View all

June 13, 2024

Rejected on a Technicality

The much-anticipated ruling on chemical abortion pills by the US Supreme Court was an enormous disappointment, but we can still...

Read More

June 13, 2024

Supreme Court Rejects FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine on Technicality

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: June 13th, 2024| Link Contact: Victor Nieves, 513-719-5813 Supreme Court Rejects FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic...

Read More

June 06, 2024

Pro-Life States Successfully Defend Life

Since the reversal of Roe v Wade, we’ve read disappointing reports that the number of abortions in America has actually...

Read More