Advocates of unbridled abortion use semantics to make evil sound good. Here’s another example. They now claim induced abortion is an “evidence-based” medical practice. For that to be true scientists must have long agreed, it must address a specific disease, diagnosis or illness; produce measurable outcomes; and be compared to other available treatments or no treatment at all. So far, there’s no published research to test any of these points. Abortion advocates fail to provide the most basic reporting required to qualify as “evidence-based.” The truth is pro-abortion activists don’t care about science, evidence, or anything remotely close. Bending or twisting the truth is a frequently used tool. I would call it evidence-based lying because we have the documentation to back it up.
Back
Evidence Based Lying
Bradley Mattes | July 19, 2024
00:00
00:00
June 19, 2026
Is Consent to Sex Consent to Pregnancy?
“Consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy, if a woman did not consent to pregnancy, she cannot be forced...
Read MoreJune 11, 2026
But the Unborn Are Dependent
“An unborn baby can’t even survive on its own, it is totally dependent on the mother.” We have heard this...
Read MoreJune 04, 2026
Mercy Killing Is Not Mercy
“If a child is diagnosed with Down syndrome or other conditions in the womb, it is better to get an...
Read More
Leave a Reply