Advocates of unbridled abortion use semantics to make evil sound good. Here’s another example. They now claim induced abortion is an “evidence-based” medical practice. For that to be true scientists must have long agreed, it must address a specific disease, diagnosis or illness; produce measurable outcomes; and be compared to other available treatments or no treatment at all. So far, there’s no published research to test any of these points. Abortion advocates fail to provide the most basic reporting required to qualify as “evidence-based.” The truth is pro-abortion activists don’t care about science, evidence, or anything remotely close. Bending or twisting the truth is a frequently used tool. I would call it evidence-based lying because we have the documentation to back it up.
Back

Evidence Based Lying
Bradley Mattes | July 19, 2024
00:00
00:00
April 17, 2025
Sunday’s Coming!
As we enter into what are considered the most solemn days of the calendar, let’s pause from our busy lives...
Read MoreApril 10, 2025
Exposing FIGO’s Abortion Agenda
Extreme pro-abortion organizations are known to hide behind a façade of legitimate medicine and science. The Population Research Institute has...
Read MoreApril 03, 2025
Standing for Life in Brazil
In my volunteer role as president of the International Right to Life Federation I have the distinct honor of representing...
Read More
Leave a Reply