Advocates of unbridled abortion use semantics to make evil sound good. Here’s another example. They now claim induced abortion is an “evidence-based” medical practice. For that to be true scientists must have long agreed, it must address a specific disease, diagnosis or illness; produce measurable outcomes; and be compared to other available treatments or no treatment at all. So far, there’s no published research to test any of these points. Abortion advocates fail to provide the most basic reporting required to qualify as “evidence-based.” The truth is pro-abortion activists don’t care about science, evidence, or anything remotely close. Bending or twisting the truth is a frequently used tool. I would call it evidence-based lying because we have the documentation to back it up.
Back
Evidence Based Lying
Bradley Mattes | July 19, 2024
00:00
00:00
March 26, 2026
The Baby Who Lived for an Hour
The Truth Behind the Alexia Moore Case Oh no, another woman being arrested for taking an abortion pill early in...
Read MoreMarch 19, 2026
Championing World Down Syndrome Day
March 21st is World Down Syndrome Day. This year, as we celebrate World Down Syndrome Day, we want to champion...
Read MoreMarch 12, 2026
How to Get Young Men to Fight For LIFE
For years the pro-life movement has been predominantly spearheaded by women. These women have poured literal blood, sweat, and tears...
Read More
Leave a Reply