Advocates of unbridled abortion use semantics to make evil sound good. Here’s another example. They now claim induced abortion is an “evidence-based” medical practice. For that to be true scientists must have long agreed, it must address a specific disease, diagnosis or illness; produce measurable outcomes; and be compared to other available treatments or no treatment at all. So far, there’s no published research to test any of these points. Abortion advocates fail to provide the most basic reporting required to qualify as “evidence-based.” The truth is pro-abortion activists don’t care about science, evidence, or anything remotely close. Bending or twisting the truth is a frequently used tool. I would call it evidence-based lying because we have the documentation to back it up.
Back
Evidence Based Lying
Bradley Mattes | July 19, 2024
00:00
00:00
March 05, 2026
Education Is Our Axe
Abraham Lincoln once famously said, “give me six hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first...
Read MoreFebruary 26, 2026
Is Abortion Safer than Childbirth?
A recent study alleges that pro-life laws which ban abortion will force women to face a 44-70 times higher mortality risk by delivering their child. While this study relies on...
Read MoreFebruary 19, 2026
Addressing the Burning Building Hypothetical
“If you were in a burning IVF clinic and you only had time to save either a toddler, or one-hundred...
Read More
Leave a Reply