Peter Singer, a bioethicist at Princeton University, is often accused of lacking ethics. This’ll give critics even more ammunition against him. Singer weighed in on artificial intelligence, saying if A I ever became “sentient” or self-aware, turning it off would be equal to killing a being that possesses a high moral value. Singer said, “All things being equal, we should not switch it off if it has become self-aware.” This man actually believes HIV vaccines should’ve been tested on cognitively disabled humans instead of chimpanzees. Terminology’s important here. You can destroy AI by turning it off because it’s a thing. Humans aren’t things but created in God’s image. Ending our lives isn’t destroying them. It’s killing — a significant difference.
Back
![](https://lifeissues.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/pexels-markus-winkler-18510427-scaled-1.jpg)
Moral Value of AI
Bradley Mattes | October 04, 2023
00:00
00:00
July 25, 2024
Kamala Harris’ Stance on Abortion
We’re in a time when American politics is anything but the predictable. While anticipated, Joe Biden’s decision not to seek...
Read MoreJuly 18, 2024
Campaigning on Unrestricted Abortion Fails
After the demise of Roe, abortion advocates channeled Chicken Little, claiming the sky would fall on pro-life candidates because outraged...
Read MoreJuly 11, 2024
Pregnancy Resource Centers, A Tale of Two States
Following the death of Roe v. Wade, the battle for life is raging in every state in the country. While...
Read More
Leave a Reply